Last Updated: September 30, 2025
Preamble: A Covenant with Our Readers
Journalism in the technology sector carries a profound responsibility. The stories we tell and the analyses we provide shape perceptions, influence markets, and chronicle the very architecture of the future. At go.sanepo.com, we do not take this responsibility lightly.
This document outlines the ethical framework and the rigorous standards that govern our work. It is not merely a set of internal guidelines; it is a covenant with our readers. It is our public promise of an unwavering commitment to accuracy, integrity, and intellectual honesty.
1. Our Commitment to Accuracy and Verification
Accuracy is the bedrock of our credibility and the foundation of all our journalism.
- Rigorous Verification: We are committed to a rigorous, multi-layered fact-checking process before any content is published. Our writers and editors are mandated to verify information and corroborate claims from multiple sources.
- Context and Nuance: Our reporting seeks not only to be factually correct but also to provide the necessary context and nuance. We believe that facts without context can be misleading, and we strive to present the most complete picture possible.
- Primary Sources: Whenever feasible, we rely on primary sources and first-hand information to ensure the authenticity of our reporting.
2. Editorial Independence and Impartiality
The editorial team at go.sanepo.com operates with complete and uncompromising independence.
- The Editorial Firewall: Our journalistic decisions are driven solely by editorial merit, public interest, and our mission to inform. They are never influenced by advertisers, investors, or any commercial or political interests. A clear and inviolable firewall exists between our editorial operations and our business interests.
- Advertising and Monetization: Our publication is supported by on-site advertising, including programmatic ads served by networks such as Google AdSense. However, the placement of such advertising has no bearing on our editorial content. Our advertisers do not influence our coverage. We do not accept any form of payment or compensation in exchange for positive reviews or guaranteed news coverage.
- Reviews and Recommendations: Our product reviews and recommendations are based on genuine testing, in-depth research, and the expert, unbiased judgment of our editorial team.
3. Corrections Policy: A Commitment to Accountability
In the pursuit of accuracy, we acknowledge that errors can occur. When they do, we act with transparency and accountability.
- Prompt Rectification: We will promptly correct any substantive factual inaccuracies.
- Transparent Acknowledgment: For significant corrections, an editor’s note will be appended to the article. This note will clearly explain the nature of the error and the change that was made. Minor typographical or grammatical errors may be corrected without a formal note.
- Reader Notification: We encourage our readers to bring potential errors to our attention via our Contact Us page. We believe that acknowledging and correcting our mistakes is fundamental to earning and maintaining public trust.
4. Sourcing and Attribution
- Transparency: We are committed to attributing information to its source clearly and transparently, so our readers can assess its credibility.
- Protection of Anonymous Sources: We may grant anonymity to sources when they face a genuine risk of professional or personal reprisal, but only if the information is of significant public interest and can be corroborated by other evidence. The protection of such sources is a paramount ethical duty.
5. Distinguishing News from Opinion
We maintain a clear and deliberate distinction between objective news reporting and subjective analysis or opinion.
- News Reports: Are based on impartial, fact-based reporting verified by our editorial team.
- Analysis and Features: Are articles that may contain a degree of expert interpretation and perspective but remain grounded in factual evidence and reporting.
- Reviews: Represent the informed, expert, and independent judgment of our reviewers and are based on thorough testing and research.
- Opinion (Op-Eds): Should we publish them, represent the specific viewpoint of the author and will always be clearly labeled as “Opinion” to avoid any confusion with our factual reporting.
6. A Commitment to Ethical Conduct
Our journalists, editors, and contributors adhere to the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct. They are prohibited from using their position for personal gain and must avoid any conflicts of interest, real or perceived. Our ultimate allegiance is to our readers and to the pursuit of truth.